New user account creation has been disabled temporarily. Contact membership at wikimedia.in (via e-mail) if you need one.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ten/Bangalore"

From Wikimedia India Chapter
Jump to: navigation, search
(suggestion)
 
(Chapter intro: oops)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Chapter intro ==
 
== Chapter intro ==
  
The chapter-related talk is towards the end. I see that it is to accommodate the general public. Can we have a slightly different coverage of the chapter for community members earlier? This'll help them join and participate in chapter activities. For example, we can discuss how the chapter can facilitate community projects by bridging and connecting with community members all over India and elsewhere or help with lobbying for help from institutions, etc. Does this make sense? -- [[User:Sundar|Sundar]] 11:16, 31 December 2010 (EST)
+
<s>The chapter-related talk is towards the end. I see that it is to accommodate the general public. Can we have a slightly different coverage of the chapter for community members earlier? This'll help them join and participate in chapter activities. For example, we can discuss how the chapter can facilitate community projects by bridging and connecting with community members all over India and elsewhere or help with lobbying for help from institutions, etc. Does this make sense?</s> -- [[User:Sundar|Sundar]] 11:16, 31 December 2010 (EST) Oops, I realise there's one at the beginning with this scope. -- [[User:Sundar|Sundar]] 11:19, 31 December 2010 (EST)

Latest revision as of 21:49, 31 December 2010

Chapter intro

The chapter-related talk is towards the end. I see that it is to accommodate the general public. Can we have a slightly different coverage of the chapter for community members earlier? This'll help them join and participate in chapter activities. For example, we can discuss how the chapter can facilitate community projects by bridging and connecting with community members all over India and elsewhere or help with lobbying for help from institutions, etc. Does this make sense? -- Sundar 11:16, 31 December 2010 (EST) Oops, I realise there's one at the beginning with this scope. -- Sundar 11:19, 31 December 2010 (EST)