New user account creation has been disabled temporarily. Contact membership at wikimedia.in (via e-mail) if you need one.

Difference between revisions of "Elections2014/Nominations/Q&A"

From Wikimedia India Chapter
Jump to: navigation, search
(Yogesh Khandke's Response and followups)
(Important Questions about pornography.: new section)
Line 168: Line 168:
 
:*Dear Yogesh.
 
:*Dear Yogesh.
 
:*Thanks for your politically correct and nuanced answer. For instance the general characteristics you listed perfectly (ie. 100%) describe a prominent editor S***** from UK who has harassed editors from the Indian sub-continent for years to prevent them from editing unless they submit. Another one is F&F. followed by  Q*** (who has left), Do*W** N***N, AB*** etc. of the "Manchester Mafia" all of whom betray their racism and hostility against Indians quite publicly. Can you expand on why anyone should assume good faith when WMF's first ever Transparency Report shows that out of the 360 LEGAL complaints they've received for wrong content, not even 1 was acted upon. Do you disagree that "racism" and "discrimination" against editors from India vitiates the entire English WP [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=31222] and which you have personally experienced. What do you feel about the racist counter comments to Sue Gardner on your case ? Can you "freely" edit on India related topics at WP ? What do you think about Arbcom's general discretionary sanctions for Indo-Pak articles ? C'mon don't be shy now :-) [[User:Pradyu|Pradyu]] 10:45, 3 November 2014 (IST)
 
:*Thanks for your politically correct and nuanced answer. For instance the general characteristics you listed perfectly (ie. 100%) describe a prominent editor S***** from UK who has harassed editors from the Indian sub-continent for years to prevent them from editing unless they submit. Another one is F&F. followed by  Q*** (who has left), Do*W** N***N, AB*** etc. of the "Manchester Mafia" all of whom betray their racism and hostility against Indians quite publicly. Can you expand on why anyone should assume good faith when WMF's first ever Transparency Report shows that out of the 360 LEGAL complaints they've received for wrong content, not even 1 was acted upon. Do you disagree that "racism" and "discrimination" against editors from India vitiates the entire English WP [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=31222] and which you have personally experienced. What do you feel about the racist counter comments to Sue Gardner on your case ? Can you "freely" edit on India related topics at WP ? What do you think about Arbcom's general discretionary sanctions for Indo-Pak articles ? C'mon don't be shy now :-) [[User:Pradyu|Pradyu]] 10:45, 3 November 2014 (IST)
 +
 +
== Important Questions about pornography. ==
 +
 +
<!--Type a summary of the question in the Subject line above and Elaborate your question below, add your wiki signature and WMIN membership number in brackets  --~~~~(Membership No) before pressing the Save Page button -->
 +
 +
#How do the lady member candidates feel about being responsible for WIKIMEDIA.IN which is one of the largest online pornography hosting sites in India ?
 +
#How do the prospective candidates feel about their potential liability under Indian cyber law for creating and distributing grossly obscene pornography from WIKIMEDIA.IN, and which is causing all ECs to back off ?
 +
#Do you support WMF USA's actions on 2.April 2014 to divert and secretly transfer all their pornographic content from WIKIPEDIA.IN (registered to Michelle Paulson in USA) to WIKIMEDIA.IN (registered to this Chapter) ? [[User:IAC India|IAC India]] 12:23, 3 November 2014 (IST)
 +
 +
<!--place holders for further discussion... do not delete-->
 +
   
 +
===Dr. Abhiraj Suryawanshi's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Dr. Ekbal Bappukunju's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Dr. Mahesh Mangalat's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Hiran Venugopalan's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Karthik Nadar's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Netha Hussain's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Nikhil Kawale's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Priyanka Tiwari's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Sanket Oswal's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Sibi Kanagaraj's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Viswanathan Prabhakaran's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Yohann Varun Thomas's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..
 +
===Yogesh Khandke's Response and followups===
 +
..To be updated..

Revision as of 12:23, 3 November 2014

Error creating thumbnail:
libgomp: Thread creation failed: Resource temporarily unavailable

As part of the 2014 Wikimedia India Chapter EC Election process this is the page for discussion with EC Election Candidates.

Read the questions already asked, before adding your questions by pressing on the New question button on the right. When a new window pops up, type a summary of your question on the subject line, elaborate the same in the body of the text box before saving the page. Please add your wiki signature after your question and add membership number in brackets. The question will be added as a new section to this page. Add this page to your watch list and check back to participate in the discussion. Any candidate can respond to any question.

The suggested timeline for adding questions is Nov 10, 2014 and the discussions is Nov 15, 2014

Oct 30- Nov 15 : Public question and answer from community members to candidates

We have have 13 candidates in the Final Slate.
See Profiles at a Glance


Contents

Questions to all candidates

Candidate view of Chapter priorities and EC first year goals

a) What would be your view of top 5 priorities for the chapter if you get elected? b) What in you view should be the goals for the new EC for the first year? c) How would you be able to help the EC accomplish those? (please provide specific thoughts than generic responses) Arunram 08:18, 31 October 2014 (IST)

  1. How do you feel about Western editors not allowing Indians to edit at Wikipedia by ganging up against them and disparaging genuine sources Indians provide to favor Western sources ?
  2. What steps will you take on EC to ensure that racism and discrimination against Indian editors at Wikipedia is removed ? Pradyu 11:44, 2 November 2014 (IST)


Dr. Abhiraj Suryawanshi's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Dr. Ekbal Bappukunju's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Dr. Mahesh Mangalat's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Hiran Venugopalan's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Karthik Nadar's Response and followups

In my opion, the EC must work on strong governance for atleast next one year which will make its base strong and can make way to grow in a sustainable way. Thus, following will be the top 5 priorities:

  1. 12A and 80G tax exemptions
  2. Creation of Advisory Committee for the Chapter who will focus on just to see if the Chapter is doing all good: Advisory committee shall be a mixture of people from various backgrounds like legal and so on
  3. Frequent Communication with Community members and with the Wikimedia Foundation which will enhance the trust towards the chapter
  4. Enhancing the benefits which we provide to the members
  5. Raising more funds locally (donations from local individuals and organisations) rather then been dependent on a single organisatiion; i.e. WMF
  6. (Additionally) Let the community grow and come back to its natural strength post which Chapter and the community and focus on more adventurous things for the Wikimedia movement in India

The mentioned above things on one side will give enough time for the chapter to grow in terms of legal and financial support to sustain and on the other hand, it will help the community to focus and become more active on itself which is more need for the day. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 00:05, 1 November 2014 (IST)

Netha Hussain's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Nikhil Kawale's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Priyanka Tiwari's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Sanket Oswal's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Sibi Kanagaraj's Response and followups

  • Top 5 priorities
    • Focus on Gender Gap activities .
    • Talking with government officials and newspapers and getting archives in CC compliant license.
    • Building the spirit of community and trying to organise inter as well as intra community meet ups ( Not on large scale ) in regular intervals.
    • Bridging various sister movements like Free Knowledge , Free Culture movements to join hands with WMIN .
    • To make WMIN financially autonomous on the longer run.
  • Goals for the First year

<<To be updated>>

  • Helping EC in accomplishing the goals

<<To be updated>>

Viswanathan Prabhakaran's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Yohann Varun Thomas's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Yogesh Khandke's Response and followups

  1. Increase the number of Indian Wikipedia editors.
    1. Action: Target one college per week/ and thus do outreach activities in 104 colleges in the two year term.
  2. Strive to make the chapter financially independent of WMF:
    1. Action: Raise funds locally; solicit for funds from Indian corporate donors.
  3. Strive to increase chapter membership.
    1. Action: Create college/city/ state branches of WIC. Activity performed in tandem with (1) above.
    2. Action: Rejuvenate meet ups and arrange for colleges/ libraries/ other such institutions to allow their premises.
  4. Improve editing skills
    1. Action: Arrange workshops for editors.
  5. Lobby to have government owned intellectual property to be available in public domain.
    1. Action: I had raised the matter with the president of Marathi Vishvakosh Mandal, Dr. Wad, being a Chapter member would give me a better locus standi, would encourage other EC members to do the same in their area of interest/ influence.

Yogesh Khandke 19:11, 31 October 2014 (IST)

Hi,
from "Save Narmada"

  1. Can you provide a link to where Sue Gardner praised you for the Ganga/Ganges controversy ?
  2. How do you feel about Western editors not allowing Indians to edit at Wikipedia by ganging up against them and disparaging genuine sources Indians provide ?
  3. What steps will you take on EC to ensure that racism and discrimination against Indian editors at Wikipedia is removed ? Pradyu 11:39, 2 November 2014 (IST)
    1. Please see next section for reply to your question[1] Yogesh Khandke 10:26, 3 November 2014 (IST)

Question from Pradyu

The following questions were asked by Pradyu on 2 Nov. 2014, without using the new question template, I am re-posting them, as addressing the issues raised: Bias; is IMO one of the aims of WIC, we do have a SIG for Gender gap, to address perceived "Gender bias"

  1. How do you feel about Western editors not allowing Indians to edit at Wikipedia by ganging up against them and disparaging genuine sources Indians provide to favor Western sources ?
  2. What steps will you take on EC to ensure that racism and discrimination against Indian editors at Wikipedia is removed ?

Yogesh Khandke 09:50, 3 November 2014 (IST)



Dr. Abhiraj Suryawanshi's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Dr. Ekbal Bappukunju's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Dr. Mahesh Mangalat's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Hiran Venugopalan's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Karthik Nadar's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Netha Hussain's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Nikhil Kawale's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Priyanka Tiwari's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Sanket Oswal's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Sibi Kanagaraj's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Viswanathan Prabhakaran's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Yohann Varun Thomas's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Yogesh Khandke's Response and followups

  1. Thank you Pradyu, for these question.
  2. Wikipedia has been built from a scratch to become the world's largest encyclopaedia. It is free and open source, free both as in the sense of "free beer" and "freedom". A Wikipedia article reflects consensus amongst reliable sources as interpreted by editors editing the article. English Language Wikipedia acknowledges various biases, as a result of the character of editors who form the consensus, this is summarised as The common characteristics of average Wikipedians inevitably color the content of Wikipedia. The average Wikipedian[2] on the English Wikipedia is
    1. a male,
    2. technically inclined,
    3. formally educated,
    4. an English speaker (native or non-native),
    5. aged 15–49,
    6. from a majority-Christian country,
    7. from a developed nation,
    8. from the Northern Hemisphere, and
    9. likely employed as a white-collar worker or enrolled as a student rather than employed as a blue-collar worker.
  3. As I've mentioned in my position statement[3]
    1. I wish to tap this (Indians with good English skills) reservoir escalate outreach activities, aggressively take Wikipedia editing to students, so as to widen the contributing base from India...
    2. Arrange workshops for experienced editors for skill enhancement.
    3. The creation of a critical mass of adequately qualified Indian editors would undo the biases as a result of (2.4) (2.6) (2.7) and (2.8) above.
  4. I wish that Indian editors would trust the system and "Assume good faith"[4] sources are good or bad as determined by a consensus amongst editors, all editors are anonymous, so "racism and discrimination" would be strong words.
  5. Pradyu has asked me evidence for Sue Gardner's mention, here is the article[5] where she mentioned "two Indian editors" and then discussion on her talk page,[6]
  6. If the reply isn't satisfactory, I'll be happy to answer further questions/ present clarification.

Yogesh Khandke 10:33, 3 November 2014 (IST)

  • Dear Yogesh.
  • Thanks for your politically correct and nuanced answer. For instance the general characteristics you listed perfectly (ie. 100%) describe a prominent editor S***** from UK who has harassed editors from the Indian sub-continent for years to prevent them from editing unless they submit. Another one is F&F. followed by Q*** (who has left), Do*W** N***N, AB*** etc. of the "Manchester Mafia" all of whom betray their racism and hostility against Indians quite publicly. Can you expand on why anyone should assume good faith when WMF's first ever Transparency Report shows that out of the 360 LEGAL complaints they've received for wrong content, not even 1 was acted upon. Do you disagree that "racism" and "discrimination" against editors from India vitiates the entire English WP [7] and which you have personally experienced. What do you feel about the racist counter comments to Sue Gardner on your case ? Can you "freely" edit on India related topics at WP ? What do you think about Arbcom's general discretionary sanctions for Indo-Pak articles ? C'mon don't be shy now :-) Pradyu 10:45, 3 November 2014 (IST)

Important Questions about pornography.

  1. How do the lady member candidates feel about being responsible for WIKIMEDIA.IN which is one of the largest online pornography hosting sites in India ?
  2. How do the prospective candidates feel about their potential liability under Indian cyber law for creating and distributing grossly obscene pornography from WIKIMEDIA.IN, and which is causing all ECs to back off ?
  3. Do you support WMF USA's actions on 2.April 2014 to divert and secretly transfer all their pornographic content from WIKIPEDIA.IN (registered to Michelle Paulson in USA) to WIKIMEDIA.IN (registered to this Chapter) ? IAC India 12:23, 3 November 2014 (IST)


Dr. Abhiraj Suryawanshi's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Dr. Ekbal Bappukunju's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Dr. Mahesh Mangalat's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Hiran Venugopalan's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Karthik Nadar's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Netha Hussain's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Nikhil Kawale's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Priyanka Tiwari's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Sanket Oswal's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Sibi Kanagaraj's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Viswanathan Prabhakaran's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Yohann Varun Thomas's Response and followups

..To be updated..

Yogesh Khandke's Response and followups

..To be updated..